2. The following facts are the circumstances favorable to the Defendant: (a) the Defendant, as the first offender, properly recognized the instant crime, and closely reflected the mistake; and (b) the Defendant agreed with the victim.

On the other hand, the crime of this case is a case where the defendant 20 days' back water, etc. of the victim's back water, etc. during the 20-day suicide with female-friendly life had been drinking, and the crime of this case is not good, and the crime of this case is not good, and the defendant has already been sentenced to a fine more reduced than a summary order in consideration of the defendant's circumstances.

In full view of the above circumstances and other factors of sentencing, including the background of the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, and environment, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable as it is too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.