소유권확인
1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.
2. All the plaintiffs' claims added in the trial.
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of Paragraph 2 to the determination of the plaintiffs' claims added in the court of first instance, and therefore, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Determination on the additional claims
A. On May 6, 1958, the non-party clan claimed by the plaintiffs purchased the real estate of this case and filed an application for the registration of ownership transfer under the name of the plaintiff H, plaintiff E, and F, the member of the clan attached to the plaintiff A, B, C, and D, and the entry of the owner on the registry concerning the real estate of this case was unclear.
Therefore, the plaintiffs did not recognize the status of the owner of the real estate in this case even though they applied for the registration of revision of the indication of the real estate titleholder to the defendant in charge of registration affairs.
Therefore, the Plaintiffs seek against the Defendant the implementation of the procedure for registration of change of indication in the address indicated in the column of right holder on the registry of the instant real estate.
(b) A person who has an objection to a decision or disposition made by a registrar alone (Article 23(6)), a person who has an objection to a decision or disposition made by a registrar, may file an objection with the competent district court (Article 100) and against a decision made by the competent district court pursuant to the Non-Contentious Case Litigation Procedure Act, a complaint may be filed against a decision made by the competent district court.
(Article 105) provides that "Article 105 shall apply."
The request for the performance of the procedure for the correction of the indication of the person under whose name the registration was selectively added when the plaintiffs reached the trial, is clearly made to change the address of the plaintiffs to the current address on the registry of the real estate of this case, and thus, it is apparent that the request constitutes correction of the indication of the person under whose name the registration was made under Article 23(6) of the Registration of Real Estate