beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.08.16 2017가단17800

대여금(소멸시효연장을 위한)

Text

1. The defendant's KRW 80,000,000 for the plaintiff and 6% per annum from January 1, 2001 to June 1, 2007.

Reasons

1. Indication of claim: The plaintiff's claim for the interruption of prescription and damages for delay of claim established by the judgment in the loan case of 2007Gadan29477 decided July 11, 2007 against the defendant and the plaintiff's claim for interruption of prescription and damages

2. Applicable provisions of Acts: Judgment by public notice (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act);