The Defendant is a person engaging in driving small vehicles B.

On October 19, 2014, the Defendant, around 13:30 on 19 October 19, 2014, driven the road front of the Gu officer road 39, located in the Gu officer road in Haland, from the Haland to the north of the Gu funeral distance.

Since there is a crosswalk in which a signal, etc. is installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive in accordance with the signals by reducing the speed and by properly examining the right and the right of the road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received the part of the driving seat of the victim C(Y, 54 years old) driving DCopied in accordance with the new code to the left due to the negligence of disregarding and proceeding the driving direction signal even though the driving direction signal of the vehicle was stopped, and suffered injury, such as the surface and salt, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim before the Defendant’s vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. A written diagnosis for C;

1. A traffic accident report, a actual condition survey report, and on-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. A fine of 700,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won a day);

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59 (1) of the suspended sentence (Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59 (1) that recognizes the defendant's mistake and reflects the defendant's mistake, that the defendant has no special criminal record other than the minor fine, that the defendant has a disability of class 1 due to his age; that the defendant has a comprehensive insurance contract with the vehicle driven by the defendant; that the injured party is relatively minor; and that the vehicle