However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of the NEW franchise XG car.

On April 12, 2018, the Defendant driven the above vehicle while under the influence of alcohol 05:40% of blood alcohol level 0.152%, while driving the vehicle, and driven the shooting distance at the entrance of the Dridge C at Jeju, from the north of the human history distance.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the steering direction and brakes well.

그럼에도 불구하고 피고인은 위와 같이 술에 취해 이를 게을리 한 채 그대로 진행하다가 같은 차로에서 신호 대기로 정차 중인 피해자 E이 운전하는 F 프라이드 승용차의 뒷부분을 피고인 차량의 앞부분으로 들이받았고, 그 충격으로 위 프라이드 승용차가 앞으로 튕기면서 그 앞에서 신호 대기로 정차 중인 피해자 G가 운전하는 H 쏘나타 택시의 뒷부분을 들이받게 하였다.

In the above occupational negligence, the Defendant: (a) inflicted bodily injury on the victim E (the 67-year-old) on the part of head and other parts in need of treatment for about two weeks; (b) inflicted bodily injury on the victim G (the 54-year-old) such as satise base and tension, etc.; and (c) inflicted bodily injury on the victim I (the 41-year-old passengers) who are taxi passengers at approximately two weeks of medical treatment; and (d) went away without taking measures such as providing relief to the victim, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each written statement of E and G;

1. A report on the actual state of the driver;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes by cutting off a field photograph of an accident, a black stude images of a damaged taxi vehicle, or by cutting off CCTV images marked by a harming vehicle in flight;

1. The punishment of each specific crime under Article 148-2 (2) 2 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of drinking) against criminal facts and the aggravated punishment of each specific crime.