However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The defendant around 19:30 on March 16, 2018, as a matter of taxi fares in Daegu Suwon-gu, Daegu-gu, the defendant is going against the taxi article and the match in the taxi.

“The head of the Gu, the head of the Gu, the head of the police station, the head of the police station, and the head of the police station, who is requested to present identification cards from E in the circumstances belonging to the Gu police station of Daegu, the head of the Gu, the head of the police station, who

The term “E”, and the hand was boomed by the flabing of E’s chest with the flab and flabing of E.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases and the maintenance of public order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to F and E;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act should be considered to be an unfavorable circumstance in light of the fact that the defendant used the police officer without any particular reason under the influence of alcohol. However, the damage suffered by the police officer is minor, there is no same criminal record for the defendant, and circumstances favorable to the defendant

In addition, the circumstances prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the age, sex, etc. of the defendant, shall be determined as per the order.