보증금반환 등
1. The part concerning the counterclaim in the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked.
The defendant-Counterclaim plaintiff's counterclaim is dismissed.
2...
1. Basic facts
A. On February 23, 2016, the Plaintiff leased the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant protocol”) from the Defendants as well as the call text business facilities installed therein (hereinafter “instant business facilities”) with the lease deposit KRW 70,000,000, monthly rent of KRW 9,000,000 ( KRW 4,000,000,000,000 for the instant business facilities) and the monthly rent of KRW 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 from March 10, 2016 to March 10, 2016 (hereinafter “instant lease”) and operated the instant call text (hereinafter “instant lease”).
B. At the time of the instant lease agreement, there is a problem of leakage in the instant call text, and the lessor’s order to construct a building due to the terms and conditions of the instant lease agreement was extended to April 2016.
(hereinafter “instant special agreement”). C.
The Defendants, even though they performed waterproof around May 2016, did not completely resolve the problem of water leakage in the ceiling on the date of coming from May 2016, the additional construction was made, and the water leakage problem has not occurred after the waterproof construction was completed on December 2016.
Meanwhile, the Plaintiff paid only one-month rent from March 10, 2016 to April 9, 2016 after entering into the instant lease agreement, and paid the rent thereafter.
E. On May 9, 2016, the Plaintiff issued a notice of termination of the instant lease agreement on the grounds that the Defendants could not engage in business due to the occurrence of leakage due to nonperformance of the instant special agreement.
F. Meanwhile, the Defendants issued the instant written reply on the ground that the Plaintiff paid only the rent in March 2016 and thereafter did not pay the rent thereafter. The said written reply reached the Plaintiff on October 10, 2016.
G. On October 20, 2017, after the judgment of the first instance was rendered, the Plaintiff delivered the instant call text to the Defendants on October 20, 2017, when he continuously occupied and used the instant call text without paying monthly rent or delivering the instant call text.
recognized.