2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

가. 원고는 울산광역시 B 시설관리사업소 소속 지방일반직 6급 공무원으로 관리 총괄 업무를 담당하던 중, 피고에게 “2014. 6. 11. 11:40경 근무지 건물에서 20-30m 떨어진 남자 화장실에서 용변을 마치고 화장실 입구 계단을 내려오던 중 계단 홈에 지팡이가 걸리면서 몸의 균형을 잃고 바닥으로 ’쿵‘소리가 나게 넘어지는 사고를 당하였고(이하 ’이 사건 사고‘라 한다), 그로 인하여 우측 슬관절부 염좌 및 찰과상, 좌측 수부 제3 중수골 골절, 좌측 슬관절부 염좌 및 찰과상, 좌측 주관절부 염좌, 편타성 경추 염좌, 경척수신경손상(경추부 전체), 퇴행성 제4-5 요추간판 디스크증, 퇴행성 제4-5 요추간판 척추협착증 진단을 받았다”고 주장하면서 공무상요양 승인신청을 하였다.

B. On August 29, 2014, the Defendant: (a) on the ground that the Plaintiff applied for medical treatment on August 29, 2014, the Defendant approved the Plaintiff’s congenital, physical or living habits and there was no causal relation with the Plaintiff’s congenital, physical or living habits; (b) on the ground that the Plaintiff’s application for medical treatment on the ground that there was a significant change in the elegability following the age increase in the upper left-hand water bar; (c) the left-hand water bar, the left-hand bed, the left-hand bed, and the emulculation bed, the left-hand bed, and the emulculation bed; and (d) on the ground that there was no causal relation with the Plaintiff’s emulculation, physical or living habits; and (d) on the emulculation bed, it is difficult to recognize the part of the instant medical treatment on the ground that there was no proximate causal relation with the emulculation in the line of official duty (hereinafter referred to as the instant medical treatment).

C. The Plaintiff filed a petition for review against the non-approval decision on medical care for official duties.