However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2016. 5. 31. 02:10경 천안시 서북구 B에 있는 ‘C’ 학원 앞길에서 술에 취하여 바닥에 누워 있던 중, 주취자가 술에 취하여 길에 쓰러져 있다는 112신고를 받고 출동한 천안서북경찰서 D지구대 소속 경장 E으로부터 주거지 확인을 요청받자, “너 씨발놈아, 씨발새끼야, 개새끼야, 넌 뭐야”라고 욕설하면서 오른손으로 위 E의 머리를 때리고, 이에 위 E에 의하여 제지되는 과정에서 발로 머리와 무릎 부위를 수회 걷어찼다.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in regard to the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Each photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on Probation and Social Service Order [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic field of obstruction of performance of official duties (6-1-4 months) (the decision of sentence), and there is a same military force [the decision of sentence] (the decision of sentence, fine, suspension of execution), the time of committing a crime and reflects it, and there is no record of criminal punishment after 2008, etc., the punishment shall be determined as per the order in consideration of various sentencing conditions shown in the trial procedure of this case.