If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

1. 도로 교통법( 음주 운전) 피고인은 2015. 10. 13. 04:47 경 원주시 무실 동에 있는 무실 초교 앞 노상에서부터 같은 동에 있는 세 영리 첼 1차 아파트 앞 노상에 이르기까지 약 1km 구간에서 혈 중 알콜 농도 0.204% 의 술에 취한 상태로 B 쏘렌 토 승합차를 운전하였다.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a rocketing strawing vehicle.

피고인은 2015. 10. 13. 04:47 경 혈 중 알콜 농도 0.204% 의 술에 취한 상태로 위 차량을 운전하여 원주시 무실 동에 있는 세 영리 첼 1차 아파트 앞 도로를 법조사거리 쪽에서 우미 린 쪽으로 불상의 속도로 진행하게 되었다.

Since at night, a person engaged in driving service is at night, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering room and the steering gear, and by accurately manipulating the steering gear.

그럼에도 불구하고 피고인은 이를 게을리 한 채 위와 같이 술에 취하여 운전한 과실로 피고 인의 차량 앞 범퍼 부분 등으로 세 영리 첼 1차 아파트 울타리를 들이받았다.

Ultimately, even though the Defendant destroyed the fence owned by the victim’s name due to the above occupational negligence, thereby causing danger to the road, the Defendant escaped without taking measures to prevent the danger on the road and ensure smooth traffic flow.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Reports on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. A report on the detection of the driver at home, a report on the circumstances of the driver at home, and a report on the circumstances of the driver at home;

1. A written appraisal of alcohol during blood;

1. Investigation report (to telephone conversations between damaged water C);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning field photographs and drinking accidents;

1. Article 148-2(2)1, Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of drinking alcohol), Article 148, Article 54(1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of taking measures after an accident), and Article 54(1) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense shall be subject to each of the fines.