재요양 및 추가상병 불승인처분 취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, and such reasoning is identical to that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal or addition of some contents as follows. As such, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 42
In addition, the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance (hereinafter referred to as "the first part") "the semi-monthly ion on the side of the slives inside the slives" shall be considered as "the previous approved injury and disease".
The following shall be added to the third place of the judgment of the first instance.
【나. 관계 법령 ▣ 산업재해보상보험법 제49조(추가상병 요양급여의 신청) 업무상의 재해로 요양 중인 근로자는 다음 각 호의 어느 하나에 해당하는 경우에는 그 부상 또는 질병(이하 "추가상병"이라 한다
any person may apply for a medical care benefit with respect to such person.
1. Where medical care is necessary as an injury or a disease which has already occurred due to the occupational accident is additionally discovered;
2. Where a new disease occurs as a result of the occurrence of an injury or disease caused by the relevant occupational accident and requires medical care. (1) If there exists a medical opinion that a person who has received medical care benefits under Article 40 suffers from a recurrence of an occupational injury or disease that was the object of medical care after the cure, or that active treatment of such occupational injury or disease is needed as his/her state becomes worse than the time of cure, he/she may again receive medical care benefits under Article 40 (hereinafter referred to as "additional
(2) Necessary matters concerning the requirements, procedures, etc. for additional medical care shall be prescribed by Presidential Decree.
The third part of the judgment of the first instance court is "(c)", the fourth part is "C.", and the fifth part is "D.", and the fifth part is "E.", respectively.
The 5th Judgment of the first instance court, “The fact that there is no dispute,” and next, the 5th Decision added “The 1, 2-2 of the evidence No. 2.”
Following the judgment of the court of first instance No. 18, the court of first instance “assumptive” is followed by the Supreme Court Decision 2000Du5050 Decided April 26, 2002.