2. According to the records, the defendant stolen one cargo vehicle equivalent to the market value of KRW 1.5 million, and the above cargo vehicle was returned to the victim.

However, considering the fact that the Defendant had been sentenced to punishment for nine times due to the theft, special larceny, violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) and the fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime under the same several laws at all times, the lower court’s punishment seems to be appropriate, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is rejected.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.