특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person engaged in the operation of the B-to-pur vehicle.
On November 17, 2013, the Defendant driven the above car at around 02:40, and proceeded ahead of tunnels or boats, which are located at the two Dongs of Daegu-gu, Seogu, Daegu-gu, with a view to a two-lane distance range from the reduction-distance bank to a two-lane distance range, at about 60km long.
A person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to live well on the front side and the left side and safely drive the motor vehicle to prevent the accident in advance.
Nevertheless, the Defendant found the victim C(53 years old) driving while neglecting this and took a sudden action to stop, but the Defendant was unable to take such action and received the back portion of the said cab as the front part of the said cab.
Ultimately, the Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim, such as salt ties, tensions, etc. in need of treatment for about two weeks, and at the same time, 6,178,504 won, such as the exchange of back pans, destroyed the said taxi to the extent that the repair cost, such as the exchange of back pans, did not immediately stop and escape without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;
1. A medical certificate;
1. Written estimate;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to survey reports on actual conditions and photographs of accident vehicles;
1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes related to the crime, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of issue after the accident);
1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;
1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;
1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;
1. It shall be decided as ordered on the grounds of not less than Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the fact that the insurance was subscribed for a comprehensive insurance, and the fact that the defendant surrenders himself);