When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On July 11, 2015, around 09:37, the Defendant: (a) committed several assaults against the Defendant, on the ground that the slope C belonging to the above police station, who was in charge of providing civil service guidance at the Songpa-gu Seoul Police Station 221, did not properly respond to the Defendant’s report.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning civil petition guidance by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to take photographs by working days and by cutting CCTV images;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order appears to have reached the crime of this case on the ground that the defendant returned to the police station because he was not aware of his safety and guidance about his children properly. The defendant recognized the crime of this case, the defendant's assault committed against the police officer, the degree of assault committed against the police officer is relatively excessive, the victim police officer deposited 70,000 won for the victim police officer, and the defendant deposited 70,000 won for the crime of violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents in 196. The defendant did not have any other criminal record except for the criminal punishment of a fine of 2.5 million won due to the defendant's violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the sentence like the order shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account all the conditions as shown in the arguments