beta
(영문) 청주지방법원 제천지원 2017.09.07 2017고단94

상해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2017 Highest 94] On December 11, 2016, the Defendant: (a) on the road front of “D” main points located in Jeju-si around 01:00 on December 11, 2016; and (b) on the ground that the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, is about about 40 years old for a victim E (40 years old) with the age of drinking.

In drinking, the victim’s face face was 4 to 5 times, and the victim was injured by two complete escapes, etc.

[2017 Highest 206] The Defendant received a resident registration certificate from F in lieu of one mobile phone in the name of the female from F, with a request from F to request the delivery of the resident registration certificate. At his/her own discretion, he/she had the victim F’s cellular phone opened an additional cell phone with the victim F’s intention to sell the mobile phone.

1. On December 24, 2015, the Defendant forged two copies of an application for mobile phone purchase in the name of the subscriber, “F”, “K” in the customer address column, “F” in the customer address column, and “F” in the applicant/party column, respectively, with the intention of exercising his/her right and duty signed thereon, at the “H” mobile phone sales store located in Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, and then forged two copies of the application for mobile phone purchase in the name of “F”, which is a private document related to rights and duties.

2. The Defendant exercised the aforementioned investigation document’s application for subscription to a forged LGU to M who is aware of the forgery at the above date, time, and at the above place, as if the document was duly formed, and exercised the application for subscription to a forged mobile phone.

3. Violation of the Resident Registration Act, fraud, even though the facts at the above date, time, and place had not been permitted by F to open more than one mobile phone in the name of F, F to forge the F’s application form with F’s resident registration certificate and the F’s application form with F’s resident registration certificate and the F’s application form with F’s personal registration certificate were issued to F M., with two cellphones in the aggregate amount of KRW 2,149,60 from the victim’s damage.