1. On May 7, 2015, the Defendant: (a) at the “C” clothing shop located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul; (b) caused the Defendant to steals a white retail tts worth KRW 69,000 at the market price by taking advantage of the gaps in which surveillance of the victim D, the owner of the said store, was neglected; and (c) committed theft.

2. At around 16:55 on May 7, 2015, the Defendant: (a) stolen a cryptic 100 won of the market price and a cryptive 10,900 won of the market price using the gaps in surveillance of the victim G, an employee of the said store, at the “F cosmetics store” located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Gangnam-gu, Seoul.

3. On May 7, 2015, around 17:35, the Defendant, at the “I” cosmetics store located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul. Around 17:805, the Defendant: (a) caused a theft by taking advantage of the gaps of surveillance by the victim J, an employee of the said store, one of the scood Coup case at the market price of KRW 6,800 and one of the scood four hundred (3,000) at the market price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each statute on police statements to D, G and J;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and each provision of Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts.

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Penalty fine of 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence (see, e.g., Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e., that the defendant recognized a mistake and reflects the truth, that there is little damage, that the defendant would have discharged the damage,