beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.04.22 2018가단5053241

소유권이전등기

Text

1. Nonparty J (K) shall:

A. As to the real estate listed in [Attachment 1] List 1, Defendant D:

B. Defendant E.

Reasons

1. On November 13, 2002, Plaintiff C purchased real estate listed in Annex II Section 2, an aggregate building, from the network N on November 13, 2002, and Plaintiff A and B purchased real estate listed in Annex II Section 1, an aggregate building from J on July 29, 2003.

Although the registration of each section of exclusive ownership was completed in the future of the plaintiffs, the shares of 0.63/1/1 of each of the Seoul Seocho-gu SeoulO and P, a site for an aggregate building, still remains in the name of the network N, and the shares of 0.402/1 of each of them remains in the name of 0.402/1 of the network N, which is the former seller (I's sale date: February 12, 1987; buyer: L) of the network N, and the shares of 0.50/1 of each of them remain in the name of the network Q (the sale date of net Q: November 25, 2001; and buyer: J).

The share in each of the above site is a share in an aggregate building related to the boiler room, which is a co-owned part, and is part of the subject matter of sale under the plaintiffs' respective sales contract, and as such, the ownership transfer registration remains in the previous owner's name. As to the share in each of the above site, Defendant G, the heir of the network N, and H are obligated to complete the registration of ownership transfer based on each inheritance share for the reason of sale on November 13, 2002 to the plaintiff C, Defendant D, E, and F, the heir of net Q, upon the request of the plaintiff A and B, who subrogated to J on November 13, 201, and upon the request of the plaintiff C, who subrogated to the intermediate owner, the registration of ownership transfer based on each inheritance share, and I is obligated to complete the registration of ownership transfer for the reason of sale on February 12, 1987.

2. As the judgment on the claim against Defendant G does not clearly dispute the Plaintiffs’ assertion in the pleading, it is deemed that Defendant G led to the confession of the Plaintiffs’ assertion in accordance with Article 150(1) of the Civil Procedure Act.

3. Determination as to the remaining Defendants except Defendant G

(a) Indication of claims: To be as described in paragraph (1);

B. Defendant F, H, and I: Decision by public notice (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act) 2) Defendant D, Defendant D.