2. There is no special change in circumstances in the trial about sentencing.

In light of the legislative purport of the Juvenile Protection Act that intends to protect juveniles from a harmful environment so that they grow into a healthy personality body, the criminal liability of the defendant who sold alcoholic beverages to juveniles is not easy without confirming their identification cards, the defendant's records of criminal punishment several times are disadvantageous to the defendant, and the defendant recognizes the crime of this case and reflects the fact that the defendant has no record of punishment for the same kind of crime, the defendant's age, sex, environment, circumstances and motive leading to the crime of this case, and the circumstances before and after the crime are considered as favorable to the defendant. In full view of the records of this case and the sentencing conditions indicated in the theory of changes, the sentencing of the court below was too excessive and exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.

It does not seem that it does not appear.

Defendant’s assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.