폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동공갈)등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) by the lower court is too unreasonable as the penalty (7 million won) imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.
2. Recognizing and opposing the determination of the crime, there are no criminal records of the same kind, and the equity with the case of the judgment at the same time as the first head of the crime in the judgment of the court below, which is one of the concurrent crimes after Article 37 of the Criminal Act, should be considered.
However, the lower court appears to have determined the sentence in light of the favorable circumstances, and there is no change in circumstances that may be considered in the new sentencing after the sentence of the lower judgment, there is no agreement with the victim, there is a history of criminal punishment several times, and other various circumstances that form the conditions for the sentencing specified in the instant case, including the Defendant’s age, sex, criminal conduct, environment, family relationship, and circumstances after the crime, it is difficult to view the lower court’s sentence as being too unreasonable.
Therefore, we do not accept the above argument of the defendant's above sentencing.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.