A, B, C, and D shall be punished by imprisonment for six months, and by a fine of KRW 5,00,000,000, respectively.

(b).

1. Defendant A, B, C, and D’s joint criminal conduct is a representative director E of a limited-liability company established for the purpose of entrusted farming, etc. Defendant B is a person operating a “J agency for the same industry” as the agricultural machinery sales business chain, and Defendant C, and D are both married couple engaged in agriculture.

In order to diversify farming, Jeollabuk-do promoted the "K Support Project" in 2012 for the agricultural cooperatives, agricultural partnership corporations, distribution and processing companies, etc. that groupe rice and other crops at least 20 hectares, and purchase them under a contract with farmers, etc., with low temperature storage and Si/Gun expenses, etc., and for the purpose of supporting production harvest equipment, etc. around February 2012, Defendant A applied for the said project with a project cost of KRW 200 million (subsidies 140,000,000,000 and KRW 60,000,000).

However, around August 2012, Defendant A and Defendant B conspired with Defendant A and Defendant B to receive subsidies for the aforementioned support program, by purchasing one compact in the compact form from Defendant C and D through the above support program applied in the name of a limited company E, which is not eligible to receive the above support program, when it is difficult for Defendant C and D to implement the above support program due to lack of self-payment ability. Defendant C and D conspired with Defendant A and Defendant B, who purchased one compact form from Defendant B, and who would have purchased the compact form from the limited company E through the above support program.

Defendant

B On September 25, 2012, Defendant D supplied 58,40,000 won for the compact (name: DXM85G, expected number: M) to Defendant D, and Defendant A was notified of the decision to grant subsidies of the above Support Project on October 25, 2012.

However, the contents of the subsidy project decided against Defendant A are low temperature storage and one unit, and through which it would not be able to receive a subsidy for the said compact.