beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.10.28 2020나55444

위자료

Text

The application for intervention by the independent party of this case shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit incurred by the intervention of an independent party shall be.

Reasons

In accordance with Article 79(1) of the Civil Procedure Act, an independent party interventions in a lawsuit as a party by asserting that all or part of the subject matter of lawsuit is his own right, or a third party asserting that his right is infringed upon as a result of the lawsuit as the other party or both of the parties as the other party. In the case of an independent party intervention application of this case, it is evident that even according to the purport of the intervenor's participation or the reasons for the intervention, it does not assert that all or part of the subject matter of the lawsuit of consolation money case of 2017Na76106 (the judgment was rendered on September 23, 2020) is his own right or that the right is infringed upon

The application for intervention by the independent party of this case is unlawful and cannot be corrected because it fails to meet the requirements for participation. Thus, it shall be dismissed without holding any pleadings pursuant to Article 219 of the Civil Procedure Act.