부정수표단속법위반
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
From July 15, 1993, the Defendant concluded a contract for current account transaction with the Red East Branch of the National Bank and traded checks.
1. On June 10, 2013, the Defendant issued one check number E, face value KRW 3 million, and date of issuance on September 10, 2013 in D managed by the Defendant, Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seoul, issued one copy of household check in the name of a national bank as indicated on September 10, 2013 and presented the check to the above bank on September 10, 2013 during the period of presentment for payment, but did not receive the suspension of transaction.
2. On June 12, 2013, the Defendant issued one check number F, face value 3 million won, and one copy of a household check under the name of a national bank listed on September 12, 2013, which was issued on September 12, 2013, and presented the check to the above bank on September 12, 2013, which was within the time limit for presentment for payment, but did not receive a disposition of suspension for transaction.
3. On June 15, 2013, the Defendant issued one check number G, face value KRW 3 million, and issuance date in the name of a national bank listed on September 15, 2013, and presented the check to the above bank on September 13, 2013, which was within the time limit for presentment for payment by the holder of the check, but did not receive a disposition of suspension of transaction.
From July 15, 1993, the Defendant entered into a check contract with the Red East Branch of the National Bank and traded the household check under the name of the Defendant.
1. Around July 15, 2013, the Defendant issued one copy of the household check at the “D” office operated by the Defendant under Article 1-13 of Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, as the check number “H”, the face value “H”, and the date of issuance “15 November 2013.”
However, on October 28, 2013, the Defendant presented the check to the above bank on October 28, 2013, when the check was presented for payment, but did not receive the check as a disposition of suspension of transaction.
2. On or around July 30, 2013, the Defendant’s check number I, at the foregoing “D” office operated by the Defendant.