Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous and adversely affected by the judgment.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, namely, D, a police officer at the time, was a U.S. police officer at the time to check the back of the Defendant’s vehicle at a distance distant from signal, etc. when the Defendant was a U.S., and was a U.S. driver at the zone that was made for U.S.-turns of the opposite vehicle

The statement is that D had a large truck subsequent to the defendant, but D was capable of verifying the appearance of the defendant, and that the defendant suspended the vehicle immediately after confirming the violation.

In full view of the facts stated in the judgment below, the facts constituting the crime can be fully recognized.

The defendant's assertion of facts is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.