However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant, in collusion with D, committed as if he had power against those who intend to work in a broadcasting station or airline, and is a person who can exercise influence over the personnel affairs of the agency concerned, and was willing to receive money and valuables from the victims on the pretext of school expenses.

1. On June 9, 2013, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim C, along with D, stated that “E” restaurant located in Chungcheongnam-Nam, would be employed as the Korean Broadcasting System, and D would have the victim C, who wishes to work as the Korean Broadcasting System Round, known well to the Korean Broadcasting System-related parties, “I will find employment of the amount of KRW 30 million,00,000,000 to be used as the Educational Expenses, if you want to do so.” The Defendant stated the above victim as “F Vice-Governor A, an incorporated association of the Ministry of Unification,” and “I will put the victim into the Korean Broadcasting System even if it is difficult.” DBS MBC broadcasting stations, stating that “I will provide a resume by drinking alcohol to executive officers, such as the president, who has personnel rights, etc.”

However, in fact, even though the Defendant was in the higher position of the organization affiliated with the national administrative department, it was not related to the administrative department, and it was not clear that the organization affiliated with it was affiliated with the administrative department, and did not have a connection to the degree of being employed. Therefore, even if the Defendant received the money in the name of school expenses from the victim, it was thought that the Defendant would have distributed it with D and used it as living expenses, etc., and there was no intention or ability to find the victim as the Korean Broadcasting System by using his own connection.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, in collusion with D, deceivings the victim as above, and is in the name of D, the sum of KRW 10 million on June 17, 2013 from the victim as teaching expenses, and KRW 30 million on June 28, 2013.