2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The land of 1,663,00 square meters in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Ddong, Edong, and Fdong, was an agriculture promotion area where farmland conversion is restricted as a green production area (fluoral farmland), but was released from an agricultural diversion restriction area around June 30, 2016.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant cancellation area”). (b)

On July 4, 2018, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for permission to engage in development activities (hereinafter “instant land”) for the creation of a site for Class 12 neighborhood living facilities (office) in Suwon-si G land (hereinafter “instant land”) belonging to the area subject to the instant cancellation.

C. The Defendant had failed to deliberate on the instant application by the Suwon City Urban Planning Committee on August 22, 2018, which was held on August 22, 2018, and as a result of the deliberation by the Suwon City Urban Planning Committee on the August 8, 2018, the Defendant presented an opinion to the Defendant on the deliberation of the following: “In order to prevent any increase in social costs, such as economic aspects, in order to prevent any disorderly spread and preservation of farmland as a green production area where farmland is grouped, and any unexpected development and the establishment of urban planning in the future from the long-term perspective, it is reasonable to deal with the relevant designation of the relevant specific use area in accordance with the purpose and characteristics of the relevant use area, connection with infrastructure (water, sewerage, road, etc.), smooth flow of transit traffic, impact on the display of functions of surrounding farmland, and streetside landscape according to the location of buildings, and thus, it is reasonable to present an opinion on the rejection

On August 30, 2018, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the result of the deliberation by the Suwon City Urban Planning Committee (Consultation) at the 8th Session in 2018 (hereinafter “the result of the instant deliberation”), and subsequently, on September 3, 2018, the Plaintiff on September 3, 2018, prior to the completion of the establishment of a comprehensive detailed plan for the relevant region (in neighboring areas) according to the results of the instant deliberation, “National Land Planning and Utilization Act” (hereinafter “National Land Planning Act”).