식품위생법위반
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person who operates a food manufacturing and processing company with the name of Kimpo-si B.
No one shall indicate any false content in labelling the distribution deadline of food, etc.
Nevertheless, on September 19, 2012, the Defendant: ‘‘(B), in a warehouse, was produced and distributed by the Defendant; was returned; and was kept in the warehouse, and the circulation period is the end of November 3, 2012, and 2.5 km, which is the end of November 3, 2012, was click dust package in the sum of 29 km and 72.5 km products, click dust package in the sum of 29 km products. 25 km divided them into three boxes, and then put a plastic label on the board of the box. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 23748, Aug. 20, 2012; Presidential Decree No. 23988, Aug. 20, 2012>
As a result, the Defendant indicated different contents on the expiration date of food distribution.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. On-site photographs;
1. Paper paper, paper paper, packing paper, collection certificate, business report certificate, and business registration certificate;
1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for reporting criminal facts and investigation reports
1. Article 97 subparagraph 1 of the Food Sanitation Act and Article 13 (1) 2 of the same Act concerning criminal facts;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act, including the fact that the accused repent