However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

1. On March 24, 2019, at around 22:00, the Defendant: (a) taken the victim’s head collection on a hand on the ground that there is a difference in religious opinions while drinking alcohol together with the victim D (n, 62 years of age) who is an owner of the business at the “Ccafeteria” located in Busan B, Busan, the Defendant brought the victim’s head collection on the table.

The Defendant continued to commemorate the victim from approximately 20 meters away from the “Ecafeteria” and kiddd the victim’s hair, and kidd the victim’s face side several times by drinking the victim’s head, and the victim was on board the FK5 cab operating in front of the said “E cafeteria”, thereby blocking the above taxi and kiding the victim from the said taxi, and kidd the victim’s head head at a time of drinking.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, such as brain-dead sugar, which has no one in two open to provide medical treatment for about two weeks.

2. Around 22:00 on March 24, 2019, the Defendant damaged the said taxi in front of the “Ecafeteria” as indicated in the foregoing paragraph (1), and as the said D was on board a FK5 taxi operated by the victim G with the same background as the said D was on board, the said taxi was damaged so as to block the front of the said taxi and cut off the said taxi by hand, cut off the said taxi at a hand, and cut off the front side of the said taxi in order to have approximately KRW 750,000 of the repair cost.

3. On March 24, 2019, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender by a police officer dispatched to the scene after receiving a report at around 112 on the place as stated in the foregoing paragraph (2), and was transferred to the area located in Busan-gu H, Busan-do.

On March 24, 2019, at around 22:51, the Defendant committed an assault against the left buckbucks of the J, as the circumstances leading to the situation where the said bucker belongs to the said bucker, by avoiding the disturbance, such as cutting the scam and breaking the arms in the said bucker.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1.With respect to D, G and J, respectively.