손해배상(기)
1. The defendant shall pay 15,00,000 won to the plaintiff and 5% per annum from June 9, 2020 to December 9, 2020, and the next day.
Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in the evidence Nos. 1 through 4, the fact that the Plaintiff completed the marriage report with C on July 20, 2017 and had a child among them, and the Defendant, from May 2018 to May 2018, knew that C had a marital relationship with the Plaintiff, committed unlawful acts, such as administering it to the lodging establishment with the knowledge that C had a marital relationship with the Plaintiff, etc.,
According to this, the defendant is liable for compensating for mental damage suffered by the plaintiff due to the above tort, since he violated or obstructed the plaintiff's community life or the maintenance of the plaintiff's marital life and infringed the plaintiff's rights as his spouse.
Furthermore, in full view of the purport of the entire arguments on the evidence mentioned above, the amount of consolation money to be paid to the plaintiff by the defendant shall be determined as KRW 15,00,000, when comprehensively considering the contents of misconduct that can be recognized by comprehensively considering the purport of the entire arguments, the period of de facto marriage between the plaintiff and C, the degree of failure in a de facto marital relationship between
Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 15,00,000 won as well as damages for delay calculated at the rate of 5% per annum as stipulated in the Civil Act from June 9, 2020 to December 9, 2020, which is the date of the decision of this case, and 12% per annum as stipulated in the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the next day to the date of full payment, since it is obvious that the delivery day of the copy of the complaint of this case claimed by the plaintiff from June 9, 2020, which is the day after the date of the tort, to the plaintiff's delivery day of the copy of the complaint of this case. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is accepted within the extent of