beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.12.21 2018고단2914

사기

Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years;

2. The request for the remedy order of this case shall be dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant 2, 2914, who resided in the Gu-si apartment house in the Gu-si of the Government, had been aware of the victim B while living in the immediate upper house.

1. On November 2012, the Defendant should not make a loan to the victim in his or her residence, stating that the Defendant “afluent apartment of his or her natives,” and that the Defendant should not make a loan to the victim.

In order to make a loan, sales shall be raised through the settlement of the internal card with the domestic business operator.

This card is used on the face of lending, and the price shall be included in the four passbook.

“The purpose of “ was to make a false statement.”

However, even if the Defendant received a loan by the above method, he was thought to use it as an individual's own idea to purchase a pro-friendly apartment, without any intention to use it, and the apartment that had not been imported at the time and had been registered under the name of the Defendant was already in excess of the debt, and there was no intention or ability to pay the card price because the obligation to the lender for the loan company is up to 0 million won.

On February 19, 2014, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) borrowed 18 pages of credit cards in the name of the victim and his family members; (c) paid a sum of KRW 234,895,032, such as the list of crimes using the card; and (d) used 135,858,238,238, and failed to pay the remainder of KRW 99,036,794 in the name of the victim and his family members; and (c) obtained the pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount by failing to pay the remainder of KRW 9,036,794.

2. On July 2013, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that, inasmuch as the Defendant’s friendly G was living in an apartment located in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H, the Defendant borrowed money to the effect that he would settle the damage caused by G and pay back immediately.

However, the defendant may pay money from the injured party.