beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.02.03 2016누55300

부당해고구제재심판정취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal, including the costs of supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance concerning this case are as follows: "The plaintiff appealed against it and the above case is pending in the Supreme Court at the present Supreme Court" part of the third 4,5 of the judgment of the court of first instance "(see Supreme Court Decision 2016Du3683, Feb. 5, 2016)"; "No. 5, 6, and 18" of the fifth 16th 16th 16th of the judgment of the court of first instance added "No. 1-2"; "No. 1-2" of the first 12th 12th 12th 12 of the judgment of the court of first instance "the fact that it is difficult to find a legitimate motive"; and "the plaintiff who is in charge of business promotion at a small business place with ten full-time workers is added several times to "an act that may disturb the order of deceptive means within the workplace and the order of service order in the court of first instance," thereby citing it in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Civil Procedure Act.

(2) The court of first instance that rejected the Plaintiff’s assertion even if all of the evidence presented at the court of first instance and the court of first instance were examined, the court of first instance that rejected the Plaintiff’s claim should be dismissed. The judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable with this conclusion.

Therefore, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.