성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months.
Defendant
evidence seized from B.
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
On November 30, 201, A was sentenced to six months of imprisonment due to night residence intrusion and larceny at the Seoul Western District Court (Seoul Western District Court) on July 21, 201 and completed the execution of the sentence in Seoul Southern Prison on July 21, 2012.
1. Defendant B, from around December 28, 2013 to June 25, 2014, operated a sexual traffic business establishment with the trade name “F” from the fifth floor of the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E-building, employed Defendant A as a business owner in the name of the above business establishment in preparation for the crackdown by having the bed and shower facilities, etc. on eight occasions used for sexual traffic, and employed Defendant A as a business owner in the name of the said business establishment on March 2014, to take charge of the duties of guiding customers, managing female employees, and employing female employees, such as G, H, I, etc. over the said period.
The Defendants conspired to find the above business place around 23:00 on April 8, 2014, and received 120,000 won per person from male descendants, such as J, K, L, and M, and had the above female employees look at the male grandchildren, and let them do the act of similarity by using the sexual son’s sexual skill, and by using the mixed sea, or arranging commercial sex acts by using the mixed sea, from December 28, 2013 to June 25, 2014, and from March 25, 2014 to June 25, 2014, the Defendants arranged commercial sex acts in return for the same manner from March 2014 to June 25, 2014.
2. Defendant B, a business owner of a private document, operated a commercial sex acts business establishment on the ground of Defendant A, a commercial name, and was investigated by the Seoul Gangseo-gu Seoul Police Station around April 8, 2014, as set forth in the above paragraph (1) and was under investigation by the Seoul Gangseo-gu Police Station around March 16, 2014. The Defendants stated that Defendant A acquired the said business establishment from Defendant B around March 16, 2014. When the submission of a lease contract was required to prove this, the Defendants would have submitted the lessorN andO’s real estate lease contract in accord with the above police statements.