However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 2, 2017, at around 18:15, the Defendant, upon receiving a report from “D Mart” located in the Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu Northern-gu, and received a request for returning home from G, the Defendant expressed that “I am under the influence of alcohol,” “I am under the influence of alcohol, I am under the influence of this son, I am under the influence of this son, I am under the influence of this son. I am under the influence of this son. I am under the influence of this son. I am under the influence of this son. I am under the influence of this son. I am under the influence of this son.”

In order for the above police officers to board the Defendant to take the Defendant’s house and walk the Defendant’s knife to the “CFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF, the Defendant used the Defendant 1 to walk the Defendant and walk the Defendant, and used the Defendant 3 to 4 times, knife knife FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of reporting duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and G;

1. Application of the statutes on photograph of the defendant

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act and Article 136 of the same Act concerning the selection of applicable criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. Circumstances unfavorable to sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act: A favorable circumstance in which the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol even though he/she had the same kind of criminal records, thereby preventing the instant crime. The degree of interference with the use of violence and the performance of official duties is not easy: The Defendant recognized and reflects the crime. Since 190, the Defendant has no record of punishment exceeding violence criminal records and fines, and the last ten years have not been subject to punishment.