When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

피고인은 2015. 12. 26. 20:25 경 인천 남동구 B에 있는 C 식당 앞 도로에서 ‘ 피고인이 화분을 부수었다’ 는 신고를 받고 출동한 D 소속 경사 E로부터 제지를 당하자, E에게 " 내가 뭘 잘못했느냐,

C. C. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. 1. B. B. B. B. 1. B

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment (including the selection of punishment, the election against the defendant, the confession of the defendant, the defendant's primary offender, the defendant's deposit of a certain amount for the police officer who has been assaulted, etc.);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;