화물자동차운수사업법위반등
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, two years of imprisonment for Defendant B and fine of 8,00,000, and one year of imprisonment for Defendant C.
Criminal facts
Defendant
A is a trucking business operator who has obtained permission for trucking transport business from January 21, 2008 to January 22, 2009 to December 31, 201 to December 201, 201 to December 31, 201 to 31, 201 to 31 to 31 to 201 to 20 to 31 to 201 to 20 to 31 to 31 to 20 to 31 to 31 to 31 to 201 to 31 to 20 to 20 to 20 to 31 to 31 to 20 to 31 to 20 to 31 to 20 to 20 to 31 to 20 to 31 to 20 to 20 to 20 to 31 to 20 to 31 to 20 to 20 to 31 to 201 to 21 to 21 to 2 to 3 to 21 to 201.
1. Defendant A
(a) Where a trucking transport business operator violating the Trucking Transport Business Act intends to modify permitted matters, such as increasing vehicles for business, he/she shall obtain permission for modification, and shall not operate trucking transport business after obtaining permission for modification by fraudulent or other illegal means;
Nevertheless, the Defendant submitted a false certificate, etc. as if he actually takes over a vehicle between the above companies or other companies having a relationship with the Defendant, and submitted a document verifying that the age of the vehicle exceeds six months after the termination of the entry contract (the entrustment contract) and the documents proving that the age of the vehicle does not exceed three years shall not exceed three years. Article 57(1) of the Trucking Transport Business Act provides that the age of the vehicle shall not exceed three years, and Article 52-2(4) of the Enforcement Rule of the same Act provides for exceptional cases where the age of the truck is less than six months after the termination of the entry contract. The attachment is not accompanied by the attachment, but accompanied by a false document.