If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

around 09:17 on May 2, 2013, the Defendant, who is engaged in driving of B-si, was driving the said taxi in front of the 351-1 intersection, Mapo-gu, Seoul, Mapo-gu, and continued to drive the said taxi in the direction of TGI distance in the direction of the network.

The intersection was installed with a vehicle signal apparatus, and in front of the intersection, there was a crosswalk for pedestrians, so the Defendant, who is engaged in driving of a motor vehicle, is in compliance with the signals indicated by the signal apparatus, and the Defendant was negligent in violating the duty of signal and pedestrian protection by entering the crosswalk as it is by failing to perform his duty of care to safely drive by checking whether there was a pedestrian on the crosswalk, while neglecting his duty of care to safely drive by looking at whether there was a pedestrian, thereby causing the injury to the victim C, who opened the crosswalk under the pedestrian name from the right side of the Defendant’s course to the left side of the road, due to the collision with the part of the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle, which opened the crosswalk in accordance with the pedestrian name for about six weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C's statement on the occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. Photographss of an accident vehicle and a black fluor video image;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso of Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;