A. The Defendant was in a mental and physical state due to the accident after the accident and alcohol addiction, etc.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing is heavy.

2. Determination

A. According to the record of the determination on the assertion of mental and physical disorder, it cannot be deemed that the Defendant suffered alcohol from a ductal accident after being dulled, and suffered alcohol from the instant accident at the time of the instant crime. However, in light of the circumstance leading up to the Defendant’s crime, the method and method of the crime, and the circumstances before and after the crime, etc., the Defendant cannot be deemed to have suffered from a ductal accident or lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions.

B. There is no significant change in circumstances after the judgment of the court below on the assertion of unfair sentencing.

In light of all the circumstances asserted by the Defendant as the grounds of appeal, the lower court’s sentence is unreasonable, even if it compares the sentencing conditions as indicated in the instant records and pleadings.

3. Conclusion, Defendant’s appeal cannot be accepted.