However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On September 25, 2018, around 18:18, the injured Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim C (the age of 45) in front of the “D” working for the victim C (the age of 45) located in Ansan-si (the age of 2018), under the circumstances where there is a enemy that became a trial room at the victim and the restaurant in the past and it is not good for the victim to make a reasonable appraisal, and caused the victim to inflict an injury on the victim’s base and tension that requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. On September 25, 2018, the Defendant: (a) at the foregoing place on September 18:22, 2018; (b) at the Ansan Police Station E-gu Seoul Police Station, which received 112 reports, proposed the Defendant to continue to move to the said C; and (c) made the said police officer’s bath to “Chewing sprink, v. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L.W. L. L.W. L. L.W. L.W. L.W. L.W. L.W. L.W. L.W. L.W. 8:29 on Dec.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the 112 Report Handling.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness G and F;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding C;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. The Defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the Defendant attempted to go to C’s office to explain the fact that he was assaulted by C, and that police officers resisted the Defendant’s hand and boomed the Defendant, and that the Defendant did not interfere with the performance of police officers’ duties, on the ground that he suffered significant bodily injury in the course of arrest.

However, it is detailed that the police officer, who can be known by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, such as CCTV images, was dispatched to the site after receiving 112 reports, the defendant's attitude toward the victim, and the repeated stop of the police officer.