However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person working for a “Cagency” as a mobile phone agent B, and D and E are female people who have opened a mobile phone through the Defendant.

1. The Defendant, with the knowledge that it is easy for him to receive identification cards, etc. necessary for new openings from the above D and E due to intellectual disorder, he thought that he will prepare and use a file for joining a mobile phone without his consent.

On October 19, 2017, the Defendant filed an application for the opening of a mobile phone with “G” mobile phone number for the purpose of using the string PC for joining the mobile phone at the foregoing D and E’s house located in Jeju Island, and signed “D” at his/her own discretion on the device model column of “LGM-G600L,” “89,800 LGM-G600L,” “89,800” in the column for delivery price, “D” in the subscriber name column, and “D” in the subscriber name column, and “D” at his/her own discretion on the service applicant column.

As a result, the Defendant forged a mobile subscription application file in the name of another person, an electronic record of the rights and obligations, for the purpose of interfering with the handling of mobile call services by the Defendant, as well as an application for mobile subscription of D and E on nine occasions on November 5, 2018, such as the list of crimes.

2. The Defendant used the forged mobile subscription file, such as the date, time, and place mentioned in paragraph (1), by transmitting as if it were genuinely formed to B head office without knowledge of the forged fact, via the Internet, the Defendant used the forged mobile subscription file at the time, time, and place specified in paragraph (1), and exercised the application for a total of nine times as indicated in the attached list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E, D, and H. 1.