업무방해
Acquittal of the accused shall be acquitted.
1. 공소사실 피고인은 2015. 11. 21. 14:00 경 서울 동대문구 천호대로 4길 21( 신설 동 )에 있는 서울 풍물시장 주말 장터 내 피해자 C 운영의 포장마차에서 피해자가 먼저 술값 계산을 요구하여 기분이 나쁘다는 이유로 “ 씹할 년 아” 등 욕설하며 어묵 탕을 끓이는 불판과 막걸리 단지가 진열된 상을 들었다 놨다 하면서 뒤집어엎을 듯한 태도를 취하고, 상 위에 있던 막걸리 잔을 포장마차 밖으로 집어 던지는 행패를 부리는 등 약 30분 동안 손님이 들어오지 못하게 하였다.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's packing business by force.
2. According to the reasoning of the judgment, the summary order (Seoul Central District Court Decision 2016 High Court Decision 5458), and the Defendant’s legal statement, the Defendant, at the Seoul Central District Court on April 4, 2016, issued a summary order of KRW 3 million due to the following facts: (a) the Defendant’s disturbance from the packing end of the victim C’s operation on November 14:00 on November 21, 2015; and (b) the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million on the ground that the victim’s attending a series of times due to the victim’s failure to walk at the end; and (c) the above summary order became final and conclusive around that time. According to the above facts, the facts charged in the instant case and the facts constituting the crime for which the above summary order became final and conclusive are basically identical to the social facts that form the basis thereof, and thus, the effect of the said
3. In conclusion, the facts charged in this case are subject to a final and conclusive judgment and thus a judgment of acquittal is rendered pursuant to Article 326 subparagraph 1 of the Criminal Procedure Act.