When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On November 17, 2015, from around 12:00 to around 15:10, the Defendant purchased novels at D convenience stores operated by the victim C located in Seopopopopos, and then sits out of the convenience store to drink mixed alcoholic beverages and drink them into the convenience store under the influence of alcohol.

The spits or spits made spits, spits or spits, take a bath on customers in the place, fall on the floor, etc., thereby hindering the convenience store business of the victim for about three hours.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. A report on investigation (a witness E phone statement);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as field photographs, video images and photographs on the scene of crimes;

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, on March 14, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor by the Jeju District Court for interference with business affairs, and on May 1, 2015, the same court was sentenced to ten months under the same crime and completed the execution of the above punishment on October 8, 2015 at the Jeju Prison on October 8, 2015. In addition, in light of the fact that the Defendant had a history of criminal punishment for more than 20 times from 1990 to 2013 from the date of release as a repeated crime, the Defendant was sentenced to strict punishment.

Provided, That the fact that the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant by agreement with the defendant, and the degree of damage suffered by the victim is not very serious.

In addition, the defendant's age, environment, means and result of the crime of this case, circumstances after the crime, and other various sentencing conditions as shown in the argument of this case shall be determined as ordered in consideration of all the following factors.