2. Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

1. On October 5, 2015, the Defendant: (a) intruded into a warehouse of 104-dong-gu Daegu Suwon-gu apartment complex C, 104-dong 104, and inflicted damage on the victim’s public goods; (b) 3.601; (c) took advantage of the victim’s total market value of 10,000 won, which is the victim’s market value; (d) 1 Kasco golf 1; (e) 8 Ggalwegs, the market value of which is equivalent to 300,000 won; (e) 1 5,000,000 won in total at the market value of the victim’s 10,000 won in storage; and (e) 1 5,000,000 won in storage of 10,000 won in total at the market value of 10,500,000 won in storage of green goods.

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to B or D;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 330 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence of the Criminal Act [the scope of the recommended punishment] The mitigated area (from August to January 6) of Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (the scope of the punishment) (the special mitigated person] in cases where the defendant intrudes into a place other than an indoor residential space [the decision of the sentence] / (the type 4) the defendant stolen the goods by intrusion into an apartment's official warehouse on two occasions, and the damage amount amounting to the total amount of KRW 1920,000,000,000,000 won: the damage amount was returned to two victims; the victim was not wanting to be punished; the victim was divided and reflected by the defendant; and the defendant is identical to the defendant.