A. The sentence of the court below (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable in light of the fact that the defendant reflects his mistake.

B. In light of the number of crimes committed by the Defendant by the prosecutor and the scale of damage, the lower court’s punishment is too unfeasible and unreasonable.

2. The Defendant committed larceny on about 27 occasions during a period of up to 2 months, and the Defendant’s total value of stolen goods exceeds KRW 200 million, and the Defendant did not make efforts to recover damage, etc. is disadvantageous to the Defendant.

On the other hand, the fact that the defendant has no record of punishment in the Republic of Korea, and that the defendant seems to reflect his fault is favorable to the defendant.

In full view of the above circumstances and the sentencing conditions of the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, method of crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is deemed appropriate, and is too heavy, or it cannot be deemed unfair because it is too low.

3. The appeal of this case by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.