However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 20, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 22:20 on July 20, 2012, at the main point of the wife C, and (b) around 22:20 on July 20, 2012, the Defendant, while drinking alcohol together with the victim D (25 years of age) with the Defendant, was suffering from the Defendant, which is an object dangerous to the Defendant’s loss, on the ground that the attitude of the victim was bad; (c) taken one-time back the left side and the right head of the victim; and (d) took about 8 times the victim’s face on the hand, the Defendant saw the victim two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the investigation report (Investigation Record No. 29, 30 pages);

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act include the fact that the defendant has a record of being punished for the same kind of crime, that there is no weight of damage, that the victim agreed with the victim and that the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant, etc., the punishment shall be determined like the order in consideration of the matters