For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment that acquitted the Defendant on the ground that there was no proof of the crime regarding the violation of the Assembly and Demonstration Act as of August 20, 2011 among the facts charged in the instant case.

In light of the records, the above determination by the court below is acceptable. Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors in the misapprehension of legal principles as to crimes violating the Assembly and Demonstration Act by misunderstanding facts against logical and empirical rules or by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.