건물명도
1. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.
purport, purport, and.
1. The first instance court, within the scope of the adjudication of this court, has partially accepted the plaintiff's claim against the plaintiff, and has pronounced a judgment dismissing the defendant's claim against the plaintiff. Since the defendant filed an appeal as to the principal claim and the counterclaim, but withdrawn an appeal as to the principal claim, this court shall judge only the counterclaim.
2. Basic facts
A. On October 1, 2012, the Plaintiff (A was responsible for the overall responsibility of Defendant Corporation established on June 21, 2013) agreed to lease the instant factory as KRW 10,000,000, monthly rent of KRW 2,000, and from October 1, 2012 to March 31, 2013 (where the instant factory becomes a sale and purchase during the lease period, the lessee shall enter into a special agreement within 30 days from the date of notification of the lessor, with the lease deposit, KRW 15,00,000, KRW 2,500,000, and KRW 30,000 from May 25, 2013 to the lease period of the instant factory as well as KRW 30,00,00, KRW 200, KRW 301, May 20, 201 (hereinafter “the lease period”).
B. On June 16, 2014, the Defendant, while using the instant factory upon delivery, notified the Defendant of the termination of the instant lease agreement by serving a duplicate of the instant complaint on the part of the Plaintiff.
[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, each entry in Gap evidence 1 to 4 (including virtual number), and the purport of the whole pleadings
3. The Defendant’s assertion regarding the Defendant’s assertion: (a) purchased heavy water supply equipment of 150kW 16,190,000, which is owned by Osan Integrated Construction Co., Ltd., an affiliate company of the Plaintiff, for lack of electricity after renting the instant factory; (b) concluded a contract with the Plaintiff on July 9, 2013 for the safety management of electrical equipment for private use; and (c) concluded a contract with the Plaintiff on August 19, 2013 for the safety management of electrical equipment for private use with the inspection fees of 418,990 won on August 19, 2013.