However, for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive against the Defendants.

1. The Defendants’ co-principals Defendant B’s work as the office at an office in the place of commercial sex acts in Gangnam-gu, Seoul, the Gangnam-gu, etc., with the intention of impairing the business of commercial sex acts, advertising consultation, and receiving the price for the entertainment business, and thereby doing so through the website of the entertainment business.

At the request of Defendant A, Defendant A posted and contacted her writing, Defendant A’s advertisement, establishment, overall operation, management and supervision of an officetel entertainment business establishment operated by Defendant A, and consulting cost of KRW 3 million, KRW 3 million, KRW 2 million, KRW 10 million, and KRW 1,000,000,000,000 for other person’s telephone network to be used for business, and Defendant A received from Defendant B with Defendant B’s management and assistance, and Defendant A provided 1’s 1,000,000,000 from around 7, 200,000, KRW 1,000,000 from around 10,000 to 20,000, KRW 1,70,000,00,000 from around 24, 2017, the Defendants were to lawfully arrange for commercial sex acts and distribute profits therefrom. Accordingly, Defendants were to have been provided by the court from around 14, 2017 to 3:7.

Accordingly, the Defendants are jointly and severally engaged in business.