beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.09.07 2017가단509962

건물명도(인도)

Text

1. The Defendants deliver to the Plaintiff the real estate indicated in the attached list.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Defendants.

3.

Reasons

1. The description of the grounds for the claim shall be as specified in the attached Form;

2. Defendants 1 and 2 of applicable provisions;

2. Three: Judgment by public notice (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act);

1. The Plaintiff’s construction of rental housing and the Plaintiff’s housing policy is a public corporation that is implementing the housing policy, and the lessee was selected in the form of publicly constructed rental housing under the plan to construct and supply rental apartment units, including real estate listed in the attached table, in accordance with the Rules on Housing Supply. The Plaintiff concluded a lease agreement with the Defendant and the Plaintiff for a period of 100,704,00 won, monthly rent of KRW 734,400, monthly rent of KRW 734,400, and from March 1, 2016 to February 28, 2018.

(A) No. 1 of the Standard Lease Agreement, and the Certificate No. 2 of the Certified Real Estate Register No. 2). 2. Loss of qualifications for Defendant A’s lease contract and illegal transfer;

A. According to Article 19-2 of the Rental Housing Act, a rental business operator can confirm whether a lessee who resides in a publicly constructed rental house actually resides in the rental house and whether a lessee transfers a right of lease or subleases a rental house. According to Article 10(1)2 of the General Conditions of the Standard Rental Contract, a lessor may terminate a lease contract if a lessee transfers or subleases a right of lease to another person.

B. Defendant A, as a lessee of the real estate listed in the attached list, was aware that the defendant A does not reside in the above real estate but resides in the third party, Defendant B and Defendant C at the time of the Plaintiff’s fact-finding survey.

At the time of the fact-finding survey by the plaintiff, the non-party D attached the contents of his contact with the owner of right to the apartment, and the inside of the apartment does not seem to have the goods of the defendant A, and the Dogs, plaques, etc. mentioned the name of the defendant B have been displayed, and the mail of the defendant B and the defendant C had been posted.

In addition, the defendant B is now different.