사기
The defendant and prosecutor's appeal are dismissed.
1. Each prosecutor appealed to the effect that the Defendant is too uneasible to the summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with labor) by the lower court (e., one year and six months), and that the prosecutor is too uneasible and unfair.
2. We examine both the Defendant and prosecutor’s assertion of unreasonable sentencing.
The court below appears to have determined the punishment within the reasonable scope of discretion, taking full account of the favorable or unfavorable circumstances to the defendant, and there is no special change in circumstances that could change the sentencing after the judgment of the court below.
In addition, examining the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances after the crime, circumstances after the crime, and criminal records as shown in the records and arguments of this case, it is not deemed that the sentence of the court below against the defendant is too heavy or unreasonable.
3. The appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor in conclusion is groundless, and each of them is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.