When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant and the victim C were married on May 22, 2014 and they were married, but they were divorced from October 4, 2014.

1. On October 3, 2014, the Defendant: (a) at the Defendant’s house located in Daejeon Central District Office D402, around 23:00, the Defendant made a statement that the victim seems to have doubtful the Defendant’s appearance; and (b) on the ground that the victim’s face, etc. was not expressed to others, the Defendant took care of the victim’s appearance, etc.; (c) took care of the victim’s face for about 10 days; and (d) took care of the victim’s face, etc., and inflicted bodily injury on the sprink, sprink, and salt.

2. On March 3, 2015, around 22:00, the Defendant: (a) at the place indicated in paragraph 1; (b) at around 22:0, the horses that the victim seems to have doubtful the relationship between the female early childhood and the Defendant, and (c) at the time of the victim’s neck, the Defendant saw the victim as a hand and her son, who was in need of treatment for about 10 days; and (d) caused the victim’s neck and her

Summary of Evidence

1. The witness C’s legal statement (which is not clear about the motive of the Defendant’s crime; however, the statement about the part at which the Defendant was committed or the method of time when the Defendant was committed is relatively consistent from the investigative agency to the present court, and its contents are consistent with E’s written inquiry about facts and the written diagnosis of injury, and thus, credibility exists.)

1. A reply letter of inquiry into facts, both E and E;

1. Each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Photographs (7 pages of investigation records) are different from photographs submitted by the Defendant on September 20, 2014.

Around October 3, 2014, it appears that the upper part of CCo, seen as seen above, was fluorh and scarbh, and thus, it appears that it was a photo taken around October 3, 2014.)

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (the results of checking sound CDs);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;