화물자동차운수사업법위반
All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the punishment (one million won per fine) imposed by the lower court on the Defendants is too unreasonable.
2. The facts that the defendants led to the confession and reflect of the crime, that there was no previous conviction, that the defendant A sold the private-use truck of this case for the first time in the trial, that the defendant A would not provide the private-use truck for compensation, and that the defendant B had no previous conviction for the suspension of execution, etc. However, in full view of the circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records, such as the defendants' age, character and conduct, environment, motive and means of the crime of this case, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the punishment imposed by the court below against the defendants is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendants' assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.